One Last English I Post
The Orestiad: Epiphany
Bright, white, boring, and hideously feminine. No one prepared me for that part of death. If they had, I never would’ve been so on board with the “glorified deaths are the height of honor” mantra and I certainly would never have entered into anything liable to send me to this monotonous, ladies’ perfume-scented hellhole any sooner than the date I actually arrived here. Of course, I knew about the Asphodel beforehand. Who didn’t? But I never really thought about ever being completely surrounded by the ghastly stuff, let alone being surrounded by it for all eternity.
Yes, eternity. A large word for a large concept. It makes me laugh when I remember how the living used to complain of people or things taking an “eternity” to be completed or to do something. They have no idea. No one has any idea of eternity until they have died and are forced to exist, bodiless, amidst this sea of whiteness. And still, the dead know only a fraction of what eternity truly is unless they, like me, are forced to wear their regrets like chains for the rest of it.
Two and a half millennia later and I feel as if it’s been at least ten times that, but in the reality of my situation, it’s been less than a millisecond compared with what’s to come. Perhaps it is the insignificance this knowledge brings me that has made me realize that emotion is petty. Perhaps it is the mere fact of those two and a half millennia, for surely nothing that happened then can affect me now. And perhaps I’ve just realized it’s about time I apologized.
Ha! How she would love to hear me utter those words! The triumph it would bring her! But no, even two and a half thousand years later I still will not give that bitch the satisfaction of knowing I give in. No, I will never progress beyond musing over them in my head, wondering if perhaps they are true. “I’m sorry”, the two most hideous and weak words of any language, shall never escape my lips. Not in this dreary excuse for an existence, nor in any to follow. And especially not to a woman.
I sense some discomfort at that statement. What is it, world? Have you solved all your equality issues in those two and a half thousand years? How expert of you. I was sure it would take you at least twice the time to even begin. What’s that? Improper? Propriety! Why bother with propriety now? You know it to be true. We all know it to be true. Right down to the babe who died of the croup yesterday. The living may delude themselves into believing that they have improved themselves since our times, the times of the noble pirate-kings and all-knowing gods, but they have not. They could not be farther from that goal in reality.
There’s no point in lying to anyone down here. It won’t do anyone any good. Women are the weaker sex. Always have been. Always will. My advice to you, gentlemen: take her to bed and leave her there the next morning. Let her get one toe into your affairs and you’re screwed for eternity (need I remind you what that means?). No, better to enrage the gods all your life than trust a woman. Believe me, I know.
The woman in question, however, was my sister, Electra. No wild nights for me, at least, not yet. I was hardly one year old at the start of all this. Too young for anything at night at all and too young to sail off with my father to fight in the Trojan War. The Trojan War. The root of everyone’s troubles.
Of course I’m not the only one able to blame that harlot Helen for the beginning of all their misfortunes. If anyone ever decided to compile a list of all those whose lives she destroyed I’d want to know about it—so I could laugh at their foolish belief that they would ever finish. Helen, that delicious concubine, that scarlet woman, that queen of fools, ran off with Paris, creating the spark that would set of the explosion in all of our lives.
I was too young to realize what had happened at the time. I didn’t know why my father had suddenly left, and why one of my sisters disappeared with him. My one year old brain couldn’t process such things. And certainly couldn’t make the connection between that and my mother spending her days crying her eyes out over her loom. Those are my earliest memories of my mother. Weeping. Always weeping. Crying a river of tears which would flow down into the ocean where my sister’s body had come to rest.
For of course, Iphigeneia was dead, as I later learned. Sacrificed to the gods in order to obtain favorable winds on the journey to Troy. Killed by her father, mourned by her mother, and forgotten by her siblings. What a way to welcome a child into the world! Just think, if I had known what was taking place around me, my first year of life would have been something along the lines of: Orestes! Heir to your father’s throne! Now this is your sister, Electra and that girl over there, the one your father’s in the process of murdering, she’s your other sister, Iphigeneia. Now, we’ll never let any harm come to you, will we? The scene could only be more perfect if Electra were standing by mouthing “You’ll be next!” at me.
However, the truth of Electra could not be more different, or more confusing. Father and sister gone, mother crying herself half to death and likely foggy as to the existence of her other two children (she never did like Electra and me; it’s always made me wonder if there was some prophecy surrounding my birth. Even now, in death, I have no idea whether there was, but long talks with my distant cousin, Penelope, have convinced me that I’m merely creating justification for my mother in order to make myself feel better.), Electra was all I had. Being quite a few years older than me, she took over looking after me and I came to think of her more my mother than Clytemnestra.
I’m not sure at what age it was, certainly by eight, but I realized that I had been abandoned. No, not by my father, though he was the one physically absent from my life, but by my mother. She sat by, watching my sister raise me, never raising a finger to do anything for or against me. When I spoke to her, she did not look at me, instead she stared at a point slightly above my shoulder or head and replied as if to a wall. And, as befitted comments made to bits of architecture, these replies were completely devoid of all emotion. It was this apathy, I discovered, that was abandonment. Following this upsetting realization, I locked myself in my room for days on end, sulking and crying and ignoring everyone else.
Now, I appreciate the irony of such behavior. For those few weeks where I allowed myself to lie in bitter apathy, cloistered in my room, I turned into my mother, the very reason for my distress. Remembering this, I can’t help but laugh. I see myself, an unusually good-looking lad and tall for my eight years, sitting on my bed, staring at the opposite wall, arms crossed, and bottom lip jutting out far enough to serve as a perch for any bird.
But it didn’t last. As with all my moods, Electra was able to recall me within a few weeks. And then life continued on as it had before my realization. That is, it did until my tenth year.
I’ll never forget that night. The night Electra saved my life.
She woke me in the dead of night without a sound. I remember starting up as she gently shook me to see her white face, illuminated by the covered oil lamp in her slightly shaking hand.
“Wha—?” I began to ask before her hand was covering my mouth, clamping it shut. Without a word, she pulled my blankets back and threw my thickest cloak at me. Silently, I stepped out of bed and began strapping on my sandals. I could see she was impatient from her tense stance as she stood by the door, obviously listening. I know that that should have made me hurry in my work. But I was ten years old. And more importantly, I was a younger brother and she was my elder sister, impatient because of me. Idiot that I was, I took an excruciatingly long time strapping my sandals on and then donning my cloak. I’m lucky that those few moments did not cost me my life. Not that I knew that they might’ve, of course.
When I was ready, Electra grabbed my hand and began leading me silently through the halls of our palace. I think it was somewhere around there that I must have realized that my sister was not just playing a joke on her kid brother. Something really was wrong. Very wrong. And Electra wasn’t telling me. She continued pulling me along as my heart began to beat faster than a hummingbird’s wings in summer.
“Electr—” again she cut me off, stifling me with her hand, and again I fell silent. This time, I didn’t say anything until we were out of my parent’s palace and all the way down at the harbor. Now, I couldn’t resist. And we had to be safe from prying eyes and open ears. I was preparing to speak, when I noticed something. Something both spectacular and ominous. My father’s ship. The ship he had sailed to Troy in. That trim, fast vessel which I had never seen, and yet knew so well.
“Agamemnon!” This time it was my own hands that flew to my mouth to stifle the noise. I was terrified someone had heard my half-shout, now certain that greater things than I had ever imagined were afoot. Electra was ignoring me however. She left me staring at the great ship, and, hiking up her skirts, ran over to a smaller, but no less grand, ship. She was met by whom I assumed was the captain as she reached it and they immediately engaged in rapid conversation.
My sister had lost all of her calm now; she appeared completely frantic. The man she was speaking with seemed to be attempting to reassure her in some way, but I’m not so sure how well it worked, for when she called me over again, it was with fear in her eyes and a tremor in her voice. I will never forget her sugarcoated words. “Orestes—dear—we’re leaving for awhile. Alright? Father’s home and there are a few things he and mother need to settle before either of them sees you again. And, m-mother—” she stopped, considering whether to tell me more. Whatever it was, she decided I did not need to know for all the rest that I learned that night came from my tutor, whom I discovered was accompanying us to Phanote on Mount Parnassus, my home for the next ten years of my life.
So it was that I was not present at the homecoming of my father which mainly consisted of my mother brutally murdering him in his bath. I learned of this a few days later when I had the entire episode explained to me. Electra had discovered the arrival of our father and knowing of our mother’s continued grief over Iphigeneia and her hatred for the murderer she had made the quickest arrangements possible to get me out of the way. “Why?” I asked over and over again. “Why did I need to leave? What danger was I in?”
I did not understand that my mother had also wished to kill me. I could not believe such a thing. I knew that my mother did not like me, but hating me to the point of wishing my death at her own hands? Strictly impossible. Not me, Agamemnon the hero’s son. But therein lay the problem. Agamemnon was my father. I was his heir. My mother hated him, and me by extension.
And why did my mother hate my father? New reasons were constantly emerging. There was of course his sacrifice or murder of my sister. Call it what you will, it amounted to the same thing: her disappearance, as I called it in my head. The Disappearance. Then, my father had not been faithful to my mother. Doubtless he had slept with many women on his journeys, but upon his return home, my father brought a Trojan princess—Cassandra—as a captive mistress. I later found out that my mother had murdered her the same night she had killed my father.
My mother’s stupidity in this matter still astounds me. Did she seriously expect my father to be faithful to her? Faith is a weak trait, one reserved for women, not men. Why on earth should a man be denied pleasure while he is out fighting for State (and of course the family)? It makes absolutely no sense and the majority of women understand this. Just look at the famous Odysseus and his wife Penelope! He was gone twenty years and was she ever unfaithful? No! And she had dozens of suitors clamoring for her hand (and body) in marriage! And Odysseus? He slept with the goddess Calypso for seven straight years and Penelope never said a word upon his return! Why is it that my mother was so naïve? So hopeful? So stupid?
I was nearly fifteen when I discovered the greatest piece of information, however. Before I found out about Aegisthus, I was a small child attempting to build an immense jigsaw puzzle, with all the edge pieces missing. But once I discovered that my mother herself had been unfaithful, my future was settled: avenge my father’s death. I would kill the filthy hypocrite who had at one time masqueraded as my mother. I would commit the taboo of matricide and avenge my brave, heroic father’s death.
At least, that was how I saw it then. Now I know that that was the point where I should’ve begun to notice Electra’s influence over me. She has always hated our mother with a passion. Even when we were little, she had helped me understand the ways in which our mother neglected us. She was the one who triggered my realization about our abandonment. She had saved me from our mother. And she was the one who constantly urged me toward revenge from the time I was eleven. But it took the discovery of why Aegisthus was always hanging around our palace in my early years to push me to make the decision to exact revenge.
But I never realized how much my sister influenced me. I never questioned that all my information came through her. I never dreamed that my ideas were not my own. I’m not sure how much difference it made, in the long run. I probably would’ve arrived at the same conclusion myself, if a few years later. What I resent is that a woman was virtually controlling my life until my twentieth year.
That year, I decided to carry out my plan for revenge. With the help of Pylades, the prince of Phanote and my best friend, I planned an elaborate scheme which involved faking my death in order to arrive in Mycenae unquestioned. We sent my old tutor on ahead to spread the news of my supposed death, and then Pylades and I followed. In Mycenae, I was glad to find that everyone had already heard of my death, however I was only more enraged to discover that with this news, my mother planned to marry Aegisthus and set him up as Mycenae’s king.
I won’t describe the murders of these two; suffice to say that I wasted no time in performing them and that they were bloody.
It is the aftermath that I am more concerned with. Electra returned to Mycenae, happy to be rid of our horrible mother and ready to accept the credit which she was sure I’d give her for the deed. We both knew she deserved it. But she underestimated the fame it would bring me.
All across the Greek world I was held up as an example of a good son. A loyal son (to his father of course). A son willing to take matters into his own hands. A bold son. A brave son. A son to be desired (of course it is the orphaned son who is held up as the desired model). I was noticed by the gods and compared to Telemachus, Odysseus’ son, the wimp who waited around as those damned suitors ate up his inheritance. I was given fame. Glory. Honor. Everything that any sane Greek young man wants. That any sane man wants, really.
There was no way in Olympus or Hades that I was going to give up any of it. Especially not to my sister, who, though she was the reason I gained it, was a woman. And to give her credit would have been to admit that she had been useful, smart, brave. All the things a woman is not. I could not admit to owing a woman, relying on her, gaining anything more than an heir by her. And it was with that that I discovered that it is not only young men who want fame and honor and glory, but young women too. And Electra especially. She had thought she had it made, a place in the world,—in history, even—carved out for herself, and then in one fell swoop I took it all away, dashed all her hopes and dreams. I can assure you she hated me for it. I virtually destroyed her life. We never spoke again. Not from the day she returned to stand at my side as I made a speech to the Myceneans about the unfortunate decease of their queen to this.
I didn’t regret it either, not for the longest time, at least. I enjoyed being free of the encroaching influences of women for once in my life. I enjoyed being free, period. And, though I could never have admitted it any sooner that now, two and a half thousand years later, I was too much of a coward to admit to the world that Electra, a woman, was amazing, was powerful, was smart, deserved fame.
So here it is, Electra. I said I wouldn’t do it, but there’s no way out now. I’ve been a coward too long.
I’m sorry.
IRJ-Reflection #22
March 1, 2010, 1:22 AM
Filed under:
English I,
Reflection | Tags:
Anton Checkhov,
Article,
Bernard Shaw,
Books,
Charles Dickens,
Charles Kingsley,
Clementi,
E. M. Forster,
English,
Henry James,
Love,
Oscar Wilde,
Poverty,
Reflection,
Selfishness,
Selflessness,
The Happy Prince,
The Importance of Being Ernest
When Selfless Turns Selfish: Or Does Selfless Even Exist?
About two days ago, I was listlessly sitting at the piano in my living room, banging at the keys occasionally to make it sound like I wasn’t doing precisely what I was, and staring at the bookshelf to my left. I must have stared at those same thirty or so books for half an hour before I actually got around to reading their titles and then finally, their authors. Brushing past various tomes of Henry James, Charles Dickens, Bernard Shaw, Anton Checkhov, E. M. Forster, and even Charles Kingsley (who are all great men in their way, but did not write the kind of thing you just randomly decide to open in order to entertain yourself while supposedly practicing Clementi), I lighted on a name which ever since fifth grade and my first encounter with The Importance Of Being Ernest has been synonymous with a sharp wit and a good laugh: Oscar Wilde.
All too often have I professed myself to be a great fan of Wilde, but really in all fairness, I was a fan of The Importance of Being Ernest, not of Wilde for I had not read enough of his work (having only read the aforementioned play and Lady Windermere’s Fan). With this in mind (as well as the promise of a laugh that would free me from the constraints of a long-dead composer’s legacy which I had been forced to stare at on and off since the ripe old age of seven) I pulled The Happy Prince and Other Tales down from the shelf.
The moment I read ‘High above the city, on a tall column, stood the statue of the Happy Prince” (Wilde, 1), I remembered a conversation with my mum about this very story in which she had told me that every time she read it, she cried. “Wonderful,” I thought sarcastically, “and just when I was looking for a laugh.” But for some reason, I can’t say what, I decided to read it anyway.
For those who don’t know, Oscar Wilde was not only a playwright, but also a writer of fairytales (and even one novel). The Happy Prince (a sadly ironic title) was one of his fairytales, as was made quite clear by the language and style it was written in. However, half a page in I started to notice that Wilde’s use of Anderson-esque speech was not in all seriousness, but rather a parody of the traditional method. This became more and more apparent as I continued and the story conveyed fewer and fewer traditional fairytale themes in that flowery but simple language and more and more of Wilde’s political, social, and in general world views.
In a daze I completed the mere fifteen pages of intense love and sadness and then turned back to page one and began again. I read it three times before I stopped and really gave my brain a chance to catch up with everything I had just read. A funny thing about the ‘aftermath’ of having read Wilde’s short story was that I couldn’t marshal my thoughts. Not that I normally am able to file them away in neatly color-coded files marked by subject and then arranged perfectly in file-cabinets or drawers—no, that I leave for people like my English teacher—but normally I could give a person the basic idea of what I thought. Not that I thought. For really after reading that story all that I knew was that it made me think. About what? I couldn’t say.
Now I’m sitting at this computer, staring at what I’ve written, and realizing that I still haven’t made any type of point about this story that so deeply affected me. And again I ask myself why it affected me. But it’s not enough to just answer “It did”. I could turn the entire thing around and tell you, my dear readers whoever you are, that sometimes things just affect you very deeply and you can’t say or know why, and pretend that was my point all along. But I won’t because I still have some faith in my ability to sort through the heaps of thought rattling around in my brain.
The Happy Prince deals with a statue of a prince who sits high atop a column and must stare out across his city day after day, witnessing the miseries of its people, but having no power to alter any of it. A swallow, late in migrating to Egypt, alights one day on his shoulder and speaks to the prince who tells the little bird of the sufferings of the people. The swallow then agrees to delay his journey to Egypt and help the impoverished seamstress mother of a sick child by taking the ruby from the prince’s sword hilt and delivering it to her. Once this is done, the prince convinces the swallow to stay longer and complete two more such missions, using the sapphires that are the Prince’s eyes. After this, the swallow stays with the prince out of love and loyalty, performing one more task to help the people of his city before the harsh winter kills him. As his little friend breathes his last breath, the prince’s leaden heart cracks and the next day he is taken away and melted for he is no longer beautiful having given his jewels and gold leaf to the poor.
Perhaps the most obvious point Wilde makes in this story is that about the deplorable position of the impoverished in the world at his time, and indeed the point holds true into this year, 2010, a little over 120 years later. However, I think such a point should be canvassed in quite a different way than I have begun here, when I have not already exceeded the suggested number of words by 800 (or so), and have not already written a preamble about nothing much.
Therefore I will examine the selflessness portrayed in the story by both the prince and the swallow. The prince sees the suffering of others and does not hesitate to give what he has to aid them in their plight, even at risk of his own ‘life’. The swallow remained in the cold, bitter winter to at first aid the prince and thereby the people and later out of his love for the prince. This seems about as selfless as it gets, right? That’s what I thought too, and even, I guess, still think on some level. but when I really began to examine the motives of both the prince and the swallow, I began to question (as it is my nature to question anything and everything) whether either of them were really ll that selfless.
According to Merriam-Webster, selfless is and adjective meaning a person ”concerned more with the needs and wishes of others than with [their] own”. Okay, sounds about right. But is that truly what either the swallow or the prince were? First I shall attack the poor little swallow’s supposed ‘selflessness’. The swallow at first refused to aid the prince in his—what shall I call it?—charity work, in the first case aiding a poor mother care for her sick son. The swallow tells the prince that he will not aid him, saying “I don’t think I like boys” (Wilde, 7). This is obviously very selfish; he is not by any definition putting other’s wishes before his own. Now one might argue that “Oh, he had a change of heart, he saw what good he could do in the world.” I don’t think so. He actually only ever agrees to aid the prince because he sees that he has made the prince sad. He goes out of his way to help someone he claims not even to like for the prince. Later on, we see that indeed the little bird loves the prince, that being his motivation for staying in the first place. And is not love an entirely selfish emotion? The swallow, it seems, had no real thought for the people, but only for the prince. If he had really cared about ending the sufferings of the poor, he would not have protested at the prince’s decision to give his eyes and skin to the cause. But he did. So doesn’t it seem fair to argue that the noble little bird was in fact guilty of the most selfish crime of love?
Now I can see people reading this and picturing me as the meanest, coldest, most uncaring misanthrope there ever was. And if you know me, I hope you realize that I didn’t get brainwashed this weekend. I merely am questioning the swallow’s motives, not his acts. His acts are as noble and unquestionably true as they could possibly be and I appreciate him and love him for it. Nor am I suggesting that love is a bad thing. Not in the slightest! Love makes the world go round, after all (and I really do like my seasons!). I really just want to question whether love is, by nature, selfish and whether, indeed, then such a thing as selflessness truly exists. For aren’t we humans a self-obsessed lot by nature as well?
The whole thing is most complicated and deserves more thought and discussion than I can give it here. But I hope, what small confusion I have given voice to here can express part of the turmoil I felt during the reading of The Happy Prince.
A/N: I know that this is long and rambling and I probably should have just deleted paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6, and perhaps 8 upon their completion, but I felt that they were an important part of the process I went through to figure out what on earth I felt about The Happy Prince and should therefore be spared.
IRJ-Reflection #20
February 3, 2010, 11:55 PM
Filed under:
English I,
Genesis,
Stories,
The Bible | Tags:
Anthropology,
Bible,
English,
Evolution,
Genesis,
Horror,
On the Origin of Species,
Reflection,
Stories
The idea for this comes from the story of God’s test of Abraham’s faith by asking him to sacrifice his son, Isaac.
Things Never Happen the Same Way Twice
It was the fourth night now. The fourth night in a row. The fourth time she had started up, sweating, surprised by the darkness. The fourth time she had woken with that voice in her head. Always the same one. The same bright white light, the same voice… the same words.
Slowly and cautiously letting herself down onto her elbows, Laura glanced at the clock. 4:57 a.m. Too early to wake Claire, but too late to fall properly back to sleep. Reaching across the bed, she nearly knocked her grandmother’s cracking, old lamp off the table in the process of yanking the stiff cord which—nine times out of ten—would turn the light on. The sudden light emitted by the fading bulb was enough to blind her for a moment; a reminder of The Dream. Lights popping before her eyes, Laura felt around for the book on her bedside table. It was old and dog-eared, full of fading post-it notes, and hard to read for all the hand-written annotations covering the text in many places. There were entire sections that were highlighted in yellows or blues (and sometimes both) and in one or two places even newspaper clippings or what looked like internet articles were paperclipped in. The title was only just recognizable beneath the name “Laura Moran”. She traced it absentmindedly with a finger as she opened the book and a folded newspaper clipping from 1974 fell out onto the coverlet.
Above a fuzzy black-and-white photo of what looked like half a skeleton ran the headline: “The Newest Link in the Fossil Trail”. And beneath it: “How We Know What We Think We Know About Evolution”. Laura brushed the article aside and picking up a pen, began to read Genesis for perhaps the hundredth time.
At six o’clock the alarm blared and Laura reluctantly shut the Bible. Half an hour later she was in the kitchen, frying eggs, while trying to read the day’s schedule off of her Blackberry’s tiny, sticky, and blurry screen. She had just managed to decipher that she had to be at work half an hour earlier than usual that day in order to prepare for a lecture when a small, sleepy voice asked, “Mummy, is something burning?”
Laura whirled around to look at the toaster, which, indeed, was smoking. “Oh, bloody Hell!” she exclaimed exasperatedly as she hastily removed the frying pan from the burner and unplugged the toaster. She swiftly deposited the frying pan on the table and motioned for a small, angelically blond child, whose head rested tiredly against the doorframe to come sit down, before turning around to attempt to fish the charred bits of bread from the still smoking toaster.
“Mummy?”
“Yes, dear?”
“I thought you didn’t believe in Hell,” the child said, yawning and slowly trying to blink the sleep from her eyes.
“I don’t, Claire,” Laura said, a little distractedly as she desperately tried to salvage one of the pieces of toast by scraping the blackest bits off into the sink.
“But then why’d you say ‘Bloody Hell’ like that?” Claire asked, sticking her finger in the jam and then licking it meditatively.
“Sometimes people say things like that when they’re tired or frustrated. It’s just an exclamation, they don’t necessarily mean anything by it.”
“You’re one of those people, Mummy?”
“I guess I am. And Claire?” The little girl looked up from the jam jar. “You shouldn’t repeat that exclamation. It’s not very polite.” Claire nodded automatically and Laura smiled. “Eat your eggs, now.”
***
“What about heaven, Mummy? And angels? Do you believe in them? You know, I’ve seen an angel. He was really tall and white everywhere. His clothes were white—Mummy, he was wearing a dress!—his wings were white, and even his hair was white. And he had this circle thing above his head. It wasn’t pure white—more like white gold. I forget what Miss Parsons called it in class. A ha—a hi—”
“A halo?” Laura asked, flicking on the windshield wipers as what had been a steady drizzle steadily increased. They were in the car on the way to Claire’s primary school, and Laura was running late.
“That’s it! A halo! Father Pyle says that it’s a manifexation of your spirit outside your body—I think. What does that mean, Mummy?”
Laura sighed as she checked her watch. “I think you mean manifestation, honey. Do you know what a spirit or a soul is?” She watched Claire nod vigorously in the rearview mirror. “Well, the halo represents the person’s soul on the outside of their body. Really what I think Father Pyle was trying to say was that a halo represents the spirit going beyond the physical body, as it were. It’s a tangible reminder of the fact that angels are of two worlds. Or really, not of this world.” Laura glanced up into the rearview mirror. Claire’s eyes were wide with wonder. She quickly bit back a remark about how “it was all a story” and let her daughter enjoy it.
Twenty minutes later, Claire had been dropped at school and Laura was sprinting the six flights of stairs to her department as the elevator was out of service—again. She burst through the door of the office she shared with her partner and began to rattle off an apology before she noticed that he wasn’t there. Panting slightly, she set her bag down and sank into her chair, pressing the power button on her desktop computer as she did so. After a minute had gone by and the ancient device still hadn’t turned on, she pulled a stack of students’ papers towards her to begin grading. As she opened the first one, a note fluttered to the floor as it had been lying on top of them all. She picked it up.
Laura—
Gone to see Simmons, the lecture was canceled. I’ll be back in an hour or so and we can discuss your theory about Indonesia.
Peter
Well that was a relief, she hadn’t been ready for that lecture at all. Laura glanced at the title of the paper. It was lucky she wasn’t an English teacher, she thought, for she was quite sure there were a number of things wrong with that title, though she couldn’t have said what. She began to read the paper. Five minutes later she was still reading the same paragraph and still had no idea what the topic was. Well, that was what came of waking up at five in the morning after going to bed shortly before one. She sat back and rubbed her eyes. Moments later, she was asleep.
The white light. The voice. A rush of sound. Laura jerked awake, trembling, and not just because someone was shaking her.
“Laura. Laura. God, you must be tired! You haven’t fallen asleep at work since Thomas’ lecture on metaphysics last year!” Laura’s eyes slowly focused and she realized it was Peter who had woken her and was now gazing at her with some concern. She shook her head trying to remember what the voice had said. And suddenly she heard it again.
“Laura Moran. Take your daughter, your only daughter Claire, whom you love, and go to a secluded hill, and offer her there as a burnt offering in the place that I show you.”
Laura jumped up, staring at the man in the corner. It was obviously he who had spoken, but why hadn’t Peter turned at the sound?
“Laura?” Peter asked tentatively, looking at the crazed look in her eyes as she stared into the corner.
“Laura Moran. Take your daughter, your only—”
“Stop,” Laura said, still staring at the man. But he continued on resolutely, “. . .whom you love, and go—”
“Stop!” Laura said, quite loudly.
“Laura?” Peter’s hand was on the doorknob now.
“. . .and offer her there as—”
“Shut it!” Laura screamed. She whirled around. Peter was gone and the man in the corner seemed to be laughing as he continued to repeat the command.
“. . .that I show you.” He paused, laughter completely gone from his face as he studied the tear tracks etched on her face. “Laura Moran, I know you have read the Bible. I know you know what happens to the faithless and those who do not heed my command. So I say again, take your daughter—”
“When?” she interrupted. He smiled.
***
“But Mummy, why do I have to leave early? I haven’t even had lunch yet and—”
“Claire, don’t complain.”
“But Mummy—”
“Sweetie, I said don’t complain.” Laura fumbled in her bag with one hand, while keeping the other firmly clenched on the steering wheel. Eventually she withdrew it, holding a little foil packet.
“What’s that, Mummy?” Claire asked, interestedly.
“Vitamins. Now where’s your water bottle?”
“I left it at school, but—”
“Damn!” Laura cut across her so loudly that Claire looked a little frightened by the sudden change in her mother. “I’m sorry sweetie,” Laura quickly amended, “I’m just under a lot of pressure right now, okay? Alright, I’ll just have to see if I have one. . .” With a screech of brakes, Laura pulled over to the grassy roadside, and jumped out into the pouring rain. As she went she was muttering, “Still raining hard. . . maybe that’s my chance. . . fire won’t start in this weather. . . . Even so. . . Isaac lived. . . it was only a test. . .” But just as she threw open the boot, the rain slowed, and came to a stop and a ray of clear sunlight beamed through a hole in the clouds. It was almost as if God had willed it so.
Laura pushed aside the hastily bought bundles of logs, kindling, and firestarters from the local supermarket, until she saw a half-empty plastic water bottle. She grabbed it and made her way back to the front seat of the car. There, she added the whitish powder from the foil packet to the water, shook it up and handed it to Claire. “Drink up,” she said as she started the car again.
“It tastes funny,” said Claire a moment later.
“Most vitamins do.”
“Why do I have to take vitamins now? I never did before,” Claire’s voice was beginning to sound whiny again, but it was also tinged with a definite sleepiness.
“No time like the present.” Five minutes later, when she pulled into a dirt parking lot, Laura opened the car door to see Claire’s head resting on her chest, her eyes closed in a deep, uninterrupted sleep. Gently she released the seatbelt and lifted the small body into her arms. It was a walk of a mere fifty yards down a small trail before Laura reached a grassy clearing where she placed Claire carefully down on the surprisingly dry ground.
Two trips from her car later, Laura had brought all the wood, kindling, and firestarters and even an old tank of gasoline up to the clearing as well. Slowly and carefully she arranged Claire’s clothes and hair as she laid her on a bed of small kindling and then began to pile wood over her body. The entire process didn’t take five minutes, even when she was glancing up at the heavens every two seconds.
Laura sat back on her heels, stalling as she examined her work. She could still see Claire’s face through the meshwork of branches and wood. It looked happy and peaceful, asleep in the middle of a dense thicket.
She stood and unscrewed the cap of the gasoline tank and doused her daughter’s clothing and the logs in the sickly smelling fluid. Laura carefully screwed the cap back on. She reached into her pocket for the fold of matches she had grabbed from beside Peter’s ashtray. With exaggerated movements, she opened it and tore one of. The first attempt at a strike tore it. The second match was blown out by the wind. The third lit as she haphazardly shielded it with a hand.
Slowly she moved towards the pyre, continually glancing up at the sky, waiting for the angel to announce she’d proven her faith. No angel came. She new that Abraham had been about to light the pyre when the angel had spoken, so she moved closer. And waited. Nothing happened. She bent down so that she was on a level with the top of the pyre. Nothing happened.
The wind had picked up again and the match went out. Hurriedly, Laura struck another one. It lit on the first strike and she held it steady, behind the windshield the pyre created. The flame straightened and held. Still nothing happened. The wind was blowing Laura’s hair around, dangerously near the flame, she grabbed it with one hand, while with the other she moved a little closer to the gas-soaked wood.
And suddenly, the match was no longer in her hand. The wind had blown from the complete opposite direction, knocking it out of her hand and onto the pyre. The sticks caught immediately, and, soon after, the logs. For a split second, Laura was stunned. And then she realized what had happened.
She jumped up, crying her daughter’s name. She began to pull the logs away, but they seemed heavier than they had before and her hands were burning. She could see her daughter’s face, staring blankly up behind a wall of fire. Her hair was on fire! Claire’s beautiful, white-gold hair was on fire! Her face was blackening! Her arms! Her dress was gone and Laura could not reach her fast enough—
Deceased
July 21, 2001
The recently apprehended murderer of her own daughter, professor of anthropology at Darwin College, University of Cambridge, Laura Hughes Moran, committed suicide last night in her cell by unknown means. The 39 year-old was still awaiting sentence, though the trial had already taken place. However, no one was uncertain as to what that sentence was to be—life, in prison or an asylum. Despite this, experts do not attribute her suicide to the overwhelming odds. Instead, it is said that it was grief and guilt that killed her. There are many unhappy to hear this, for they do not believe that a ‘monster’ such as this woman should be allowed such human feelings. Indeed, this is the first case in many years in which it has actually been suggested that the death penalty, abolished in 1964, should be reinstated. At her trial, the appointed attorney pled insanity, for all the authorities could get out of her since the moment of her arrest were disjointed phrases such as: “All his fault” “Accident” or “Should have been different”. None of this makes sense, as there was no evidence of another human being’s presence within a mile of the spot where Moran burned her daughter alive for at least two weeks.
It is rumored that on the wall of her cell she had scratched “Things never happen the same way twice.” No one is sure what this could allude to.
IRJ-Reflection #19
January 28, 2010, 11:57 PM
Filed under:
English I,
Genesis,
Reflection,
The Bible | Tags:
Animal Rights,
Article,
Bible,
English,
Genesis,
innovation,
Vegetarianism
Who Are You to Play God?: God’s Power to Dole out Rights
Vegetarianism is a trend that most think of as being relatively recent, and as such is often frowned upon for being ‘new’ and ‘innovative’.* Whenever I heard this in the past, I would scoff at such narrow-mindedness (for really these people are just clutching at straws if this is their reason for eating meat) and deliver a long lecture about innovation, change, and inevitably, animal rights.
Yesterday, after completing my assigned reading from Genesis, I felt some slight triumph in the fact that I had yet another argument to add to my list: God decreed vegetarianism on Day six, along with the creation of humankind. And if that didn’t constitute ancient, I wasn’t sure what did. However my elation was short lived, for just a day later I had completed reading Genesis chapters eight and nine with a sense of nothing short of outrage.
For those who aren’t familiar with this section of Genesis, it describes the great flood and Noah’s (and the rest of mankind’s, though they are ignored beyond the fact that they were ‘wiped out’) tribulations. After Noah and his family have exited their ark safely, God speaks to them saying “. . . you shall not eat flesh with it’s life. . . For your own lifeblood I will surely require a reckoning: from every animal I will require it and from human beings, each one for the blood of another, I will require a reckoning for human life” (Gen. 9.4-5).
Now honestly, I had to read this about six times in order to discern any meaning, but once I thought I had figured it out, I felt like yelling “Hypocrite!” to the heavens. One quick check with the Oxford experts confirmed my ideas as correct. God’s character really is revoking His earlier command of vegetarianism, allowing people to take the lives of animals in order to get a little of their aggression and violence out and as some kind of payment for allowing humankind to survive. How sadistic is that?
Being vegetarian and someone who thinks all beings are created equal, I’m completely biased in this matter, but really I think that what God does in this situation is like the president of the United States suddenly deciding he had the power to say that it was acceptable to hunt Californians for food. Oh, and actually he wants you to kill them in order to pay him for allowing your state to survive. So go kill some Californians. Alright, so maybe that analogy was a little extreme, but I think I got my point across.
Of course God created the animals, but this means He was the one who gave them hearts and minds and feelings. For Him to just decide that they are inferior to humans and therefore should suffer for the transgressions and mistakes of the human race is insane. If they were beings enough to be exempt from killing before, what now has changed besides God’s whim? Nothing. The animals are still the same, but God’s special creation has disappointed Him, so someone must suffer. But mankind? No. They shall suffer for a mere paragraph in the history of the world, for they were created in God’s image. However animals (who look nothing like God—or so we are told) shall bear the burden of the human’s crime for the rest of eternity.
If I were talking about anyone else, I would be asking the question: “Who are you to play God?” Of course, in my situation this makes absolutely no sense, so instead I’ll go a step further. Who gave God the power to say who got what rights? Why is God allowed to hand some their basics rights and look at the others and say “Sorry, there weren’t enough to go around”? Why is it different for God than for anyone else? Isn’t what God did in this situation similar to what Hitler said about the Jews? So why is it different?
And to everyone who just read that and thought “They’re just dumb animals,” I say: “So what? You’re just a dumb human. Can I kill you now?”
*However absurd this may sound, I know it to be true as I am a vegetarian myself and have encountered many such geniuses.
A/N: I have absolutely nothing against California.
IRJ-Reflection #18
January 27, 2010, 9:12 PM
Filed under:
English I,
Genesis,
Reflection,
The Bible | Tags:
Article,
Bible,
English,
Genesis,
God,
Megalomania,
Reflection
Divine Megalomania: God’s Self-Obsession
God is generous. God is forgiving. God is loving. And God should be worshipped unequivocally. Every two-year-old knows it. But what if every two-year-old knew the definition of megalomania? If every Christian two-year-old in the world knew that a megalomaniac is someone obsessed with their own power, might they not question whether God wasn’t one of these egoists? I do, and I’m not two years old. Just the fact alone that God “created humankind in His image” (Gen. 1.27) proves that He enjoys self-glorification. The idea that mankind is modeled after God is even stressed in the Bible—appearing four times in just two verses in most translations—underlining God’s tendency toward self-exaltation.
And this is not the only example. Throughout the Bible, there is talk of the glory of God, various people glorifying God, and essentially how wonderful God thinks He is. A prime example of this is the hymn “Gloria In Excelsis Deo” (Latin for “Glory to God in the Highest”) from the lines “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace among those whom he favors!” (Luke 2.14). Again, we are asked to glorify Him, to lift Him up (as if He needs to be any higher!), and to revere Him—along with no one else. It is unquestionable that God has power; in fact He has quite a lot of it. But such obligatory adoration is quite unnecessary and only serves to make God look power-obsessed.
The way in which Creation is presented in Genesis suggests that God created the universe in order that He might be worshipped completely by His creations. This is particularly prominent in the Genesis Chapter 3 during which Eve explains that God has told her that “you shall no eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, nor shall you touch it, or you shall die” (Gen. 3.3). To this the serpent replies, “You will not die, for God knows that when you eat of it, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3.4-5). Of course the Bible presents this in such a way that it seems that the serpent is twisting God’s words only to trick Eve into eating the forbidden fruit, but it cannot be denied that the end result is precisely what the serpent predicted. Adam and Eve gain the ‘divine knowledge’ of good and evil and God subsequently drives them out of Eden.
Why, though, would God see the need to throw His own creations out? I see three possibilities. First, that He intended to anyway, and was merely playing with Adam and Eve. Second, that it was merely because they flouted his decree regarding the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. And third, that He really was afraid that they would become His equals (or that they already were). All three of these evidence God’s sublime megalomania. In the first case, God demonstrates that He enjoys having power over others (or really everything). In the second, that He is so obsessed with his power that He cannot stand to have anyone cross Him in any way. And in the third, that because of His love for His own power, God fears the idea of another becoming his equal as Adam and Eve might’ve done if they had been allowed to remain in Eden. Based off of the serpent’s comment that Adam and Eve would “be like God” if they ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree, the last seems the most likely to me, though any really could be possible.
Really, throughout the Bible, God doesn’t give people a choice. There isn’t a “worship God, or don’t worship God” message, instead it proclaims: “worship God or burn in Hell”. And though there may be an ‘or’ in there, I really don’t consider that much of a choice. If God weren’t self-obsessed and afraid of losing His power, then He wouldn’t feel the need to require people to worship Him. But as He does, I feel justified in dubbing Him a megalomaniac. But then, what god isn’t?
My Interactive Reflection Journal. . . Which is Getting re-Christened because I’m no longer a Freshman (!!!)
Hi!
Mostly Harmless is a blog I’ve begun for my English class to publish assignments on, though I’m determined to post other stuff as well (when I get the chance). The articles and stories here fall into three categories: Open Prompts, Creative Pieces, and Quick Responses. Feel free to drop me a review (or just a comment), I really appreciate them!
And if you don’t get the title, Mostly Harmless, you’re really not up in your Douglas Adams!
5E
—Update—
For some reason I feel compelled to preserve the above for posterity. But anyway, important thing is: School’s out, I’m not a Freshman, and technically the blog is done. Technically being the key word, I don’t intend to stop yet!
QR #17
Old Versus New: Ignorance is Progress
During a discussion regarding Lyra’s future and well-being, the Librarian of Jordan College makes an interesting observation of human nature to the Master. He says, with regard to Lyra’s apparent disinterest in any serious matter, “That’s the duty of the old. . . to be anxious on behalf of the young. And the duty of the young is to scorn the anxiety of the old” (Pullman 32).
The Librarian makes this observation in response to the Master’s comment that giving Lyra more information would ease his anxiety for her. In responding thus, the Librarian expresses his feeling that no matter what steps they take to ensure Lyra’s safety, they will still worry for her, and she will still scorn their worry, brushing it aside as unnecessary. There is a parallel between this relationship of the young and old that the Librarian describes and that of Harry Potter and Dumbledore. Throughout the series, Dumbledore worries on Harry’s behalf while Harry either dismisses the worry, feeling that it is unproductive or unneeded, or resents it. Many a time in the books does Harry end up shouting at Dumbledore for just such a reason.
However, the disregard of the young for the worries of the old is perfectly natural. The old are the wise for a reason as they have had much more time to see the world than the young have. Their age gives them perspective and allows them to recognize the folly of youth. Of course, with all this in mind, it is perfectly natural for the old to worry about the young who are so often ignorant of the ways of the world. In the eyes of the old, the young are naïve, open to change (for better or for worse), and therefore in need of guidance—for if they will not worry themselves, someone must do it for them. Nonetheless, the young continue to be open-minded in their naïveté, and, really, it is better for the human race that they are. Without the continuous cycle between the anxiety of the old and amenability of the young, their would be no progress. The old have seen too much of the world to be open to new ideas and therefore the concept of change scares them. Without the daring and reckless youth of the young, few revolutionary ideas would be tested or used and the world would have no chance at advancement.
Proposition: Without the inherent conflict between the old and the young, there would be no progress in the world.
OP #15
Turning a Blind Eye: Is Ignorance Ever Bliss?
In a speech entitled Is There an Artificial God? held at Magdelene College in Cambridge, Douglas Adams asked his audience to “… imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, ‘This is an interesting world I find myself in—an interesting hole I find myself in—fits me rather neatly, doesn’t it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!’ This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, it’s still frantically hanging on to the notion that everything’s going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for” (Adams). In this part of his speech, Adams was addressing the tendency of the world’s population to ignore their surroundings and to go on with life without a worry for the future.
Speech: Douglas Adams’ Is There an Artificial God?, held at Magdelene College, Cambridge, 1998.
Biography: Concise biography of Douglas Adams.
I think that Adams’ metaphor of the puddle is extremely relevant in our world today as we, like the puddle, are paying no attention to many things that threaten us and our existence, in the hope that they will just go away. What I am mostly alluding to is global warming, which—though we have scientific evidence proving it exists and that it is doing damage to our planet—people continue to insist on ignoring. Adams addresses the idea in his speech that instead of facing the unstoppable and merely adjusting their perspectives, people have an inclination toward completely avoiding the topic. This is perfectly understandable and is part of human nature, but it is an attitude that too many in our world—in our country—have adopted and live their lives by.
Living this way does not allow for necessary measures to be taken against an impending disaster (or whatever the case may be) or even—in the case of something inevitable—just the changing of one’s mentality in preparation for the event. To those who may argue that this philosophy of embracing the inevitable (or maybe trying to do something about it) is—in the long run—useless as a person would spend life worrying and not living, I shake my head because really opening one’s eyes to reality not only broadens one’s perspective on life but allows one to enjoy it more fully, no matter what it entails.
Proposition: When faced with the unpreventable, people often have a tendency to turn a blind eye and hope fate will leave them alone.
A/N: Mrs. Holmgren—I’m not sure if there was ever a maximum placed on the OP quotes (there isn’t one on the Reflective Learning Site), so I’m sorry that this one is rather long; I just really, really wanted to write on it.
CP #12
May 17, 2010, update: We were assigned to write a portrait of a bedroom for English and this is what I came up with. It’s hard with this kind of thing to walk the line between painfully boring and Gossip Girl dramatic and I guess I decided to err on the side of the drama. Looking back I wish that I had taken the challenge of making a boring room interesting, but too late now.
The window bangs open against the wall behind it, letting in a gust of wind which swirls through the room, ripping a few old newspaper clippings from their places on the wall. The wind subsides and as it does the curtains fall back into place and the clippings come to rest under the bed, whose sheets and blankets are twisted and hanging off the side. The clock on the bedside table flashes 12:00, though the sky outside clearly indicates otherwise. One wall of the room is occupied by an enormous map of Canada with red, blue, and green pins peppering it. The lower left hand corner of the map curls up hiding Vancouver from view. The remaining space on that wall is taken up by a myriad of yellowing and torn newspaper clippings all seemingly completely random—sports scores from twenty years before, an earthquake in Chile, the New York City Ballet’s Nutcracker showtimes, an interview with the author of a bestseller, stock market reports from every month since October of 2013, a story detailing the success of a movie released November 13th, 2009.
On the opposite wall above a cluttered desk, hangs a mirror whose face is turned to the wall. Flanking it, are two framed blueprints of what look like The Whitehouse and La Défense. Thrown carelessly across half the desk is a street map of London with a bold red line traced on it in Sharpie. A closer look shows that this line follows Downing Street. The rest of the desk is mess of old gum wrappers, broken pencils, crumpled bits of graph and lined paper, torn computer printouts, several calculators, and a toppled stack of newspapers in several languages. The topmost headline blares: Nuclear Bomb D—but the rest is covered by a long cold cup of coffee in a mug which reads World’s Best Dad on the side.
The desk chair is not in its place before the desk, but instead leans haphazardly against the opposite wall, a crumpled black rain jacket on its seat. Lying beneath one of the chair’s wheels is an eighteen month calendar open to April. Every day before Monday the 27th has a neat black X through it, while the 27th bears a hurried squiggle. A note sticks out from between the pages of a paperback novel which lies face down upon the first week of April.
It begins: Jean, I am taking—
The handle turns and the door opens.
QR #11
Restrictions of the Unrestricted: Every Rule has an Exception
Haroun Kalifa, as he watches the Guppee soldiers debate, critique, and question their orders, comments that any soldier caught behaving in such a way on earth would be court-martialled. Butt, the hoopoe, is surprised at this and asks, “But but but what is the point of giving persons Freedom of Speech if you then say they must not utilize same?” (Rushdie 119)
Gup, Butt’s home, is a much more peaceable country than any on earth, but this quote demonstrates the fact that it is also a place of simplicity. ‘Freedom of Speech’ is taken to mean just that and the possibility of exceptions is not considered. But is this a bad thing? The United States’ Bill of Rights promises no law restricting religion, speech, the press, the right to assembly, or to petition the government for the redress of grievances, but down on earth the simplest things are complex and every rule has an exception. As Haroun mentions, in the army, mutinous talk is punishable, creating an exception to the law. When looked at it from such an angle, the logic behind such laws seems flawed. The creation of such a blanket statement without any mention of an exception is almost a lie in my view, leading me to believe that a mechanical bird from earth’s second moon has a point about how earth should be run—absurd as that seems.
In making that statement, Rushdie uses Butt to question the ways of earthly governments and to show that sometimes laws and rules we’ve just accepted long ago aren’t quite what they seem. The promise of unrestricted license has a restriction somewhere, complicating a matter that at first seemed straight forward and simple.
Proposition: In matters of earth’s politics, every rule has an exception, and nothing can ever be taken strictly literally.